Eventhough that time has come

/, Papa Bear, Politics/Eventhough that time has come

Eventhough that time has come

Dear Shri Pranab Mukherjee,

….that time has come

– Signed: Prakash Karat, A B Bardhan, Debabrata Biswas, T J Chandrachoodan

– and a few of us sighed and others,

Good Riddance! said the TOI editorial,
Lal Salaam! said Bloody Mary and,
in the mayhem added that
airports must be privatized.

I dont know why Sagarika says that all the time,
maybe even the media has an agenda
Do I know what the Left’s agenda is?

then I don’t know why they’re leaving,
Or where they gonna go,
I guess they got their reasons.

Because in early 2004, in reply to a mail which asked whether he was still alive an old comrade said “I am very much alive, and so is the hope for a non NDA alternative at Centre“. AMEN. Hope as a strategy works in theology, not in politics. But then YSR Reddy swept Andhra for the Congress, the BJP declined in key states and the Left posted their best tally ever. The national destiny was re-written with the UPA and Left coming together based on a Common Minimum Programme, and Sonia Gandhi delivering the master stroke by relinquishing the PMO and denying BJP its last straw.

Now that the UPA and the Left are parting, or cutting the flab, the Congress and the CPM are back to their pre-2004 line ups, it is time to take stock. Critics across the divide are looking at the half year they did not give the nation, but what about the four and a half years they gave the nation.

The Good of UPA-Left years

Stability with Dignity: If one remembers the NDA years, despite the coalition having 300 odd seats in the 545 member house, there was George Fernandes and Pramod Mahajan skirting from one “Allied” capital to another appeasing the allies, and the national political scene became a circus around the whims of Trinamool,the DMK, the Sena and other regional and single-issue parties. Despite their differences, and the fact that they are political opponents in the Left’s bastions of Bengal and Kerala, there was a certain dignity maintained by both parties even during the WB & Kerala assembly elections in 2006. Which other two political parties can do this?

The UPA too had constituents, if one looks closely, who don’t have any national accountability and could have rocked the boat any time. This was prevented by those 59 MPs from the left, who sat right in the middle of the house and to some extent by Mulayam Singh’s 39 who toed the Left’s line on any issue. The leaders of the Congress party and the CPM never crossed the limits, and India had 4 and a half years of a stable coalition that worked with dignity.

The Centrist Centre Stage: If one remembers the NDA years, the national stage was pretty much dominated by whether the Vishwa Hindu Parishad will give more time to the centre before they start building the Ram temple? or whether Godhra was the trigger for Gujarat riots? or whether Narendra Moditva can be replicated?

The debate shifted with the 2004 verdict. The Left had no need to interpret the 2004 verdict as one for secularism – for them it was an anti-Congress verdict in Kerala and Bengal, but they did.  “Pseudo-Secularism” – I haven’t heard that word used that often in the past 4 years. India started talking about inclusive growth despite the shining. Programmes like NREG and the Loan Waiver, despite the criticism, made the nation’s priorities clear. The national debate shifted to the left of centre.

Reader’s Words has sanely put it, in the tragic end of an experiment

If the UPA had not gone ahead with the deal, it might have suffered a temporary loss of face, and the Left would have taken the flak for its obstinacy. Ironically, it was Mrs Sonia Gandhi who used the Gandhian technique of sacrificing a position and winning a moral battle. Manmohan Singh has done exactly the reverse- he might have won a battle, but he has lost the war and put to rest the experiment to build a Centrist United Front.

It is a political oppurtunity lost, but I hope the Congress and the CPM come together again in 2009 because they are both patriotic parties and dignified partners. Hope is not a strategy in itself, but as my friend said in 2004, hope is alive for a non-NDA alternative at centre.

By | 2014-07-16T23:29:36-05:00 July 17th, 2008|India, Papa Bear, Politics|5 Comments


  1. bhupinder July 17, 2008 at 10:06 am

    It is very sad to see the Congress/ UPA getting into horse trading in the last one week or so. The Left may be rather dogmatic at times, but it is quite principled as compared to the SPs and JMMs. The Left and the Congress also share their roots in the Indian freedom struggle, unlike other parties. In the short term, the split might even benefit the Left in WB and Kerala, but not in the rest of the country because the Left just does not have a nation wide presence. The BJP too seems to have lost some of its sheen in the last 4 years but may revive, as indeed it seems to be doing, its religious agenda.

  2. bombaydosti July 17, 2008 at 11:45 am

    BVN, its an excellent post!
    Grounded and complete! Have always respected your view points. This post is a well articulated one.
    You are right; a lot was spoken about inclusive growth, in the last four years. I might take some time to understand/take a stand on Karat or Basu’s opinion. But I guess this post was not about that, but only on hope! loved it!

  3. Payyan July 18, 2008 at 2:12 am

    I don’t think a centrist united front was ever on the cards. The dignity with which the left and the congress formed and sustained a loose bundle to keep out the “communal forces” was commendable in itself. But both of them would have known that it would not last the full term. In states like Kerala and Bengal, where the Communal upper castes are not the primary opponents, both the Left and the Congress would have faced a crisis of identity had this coalition lasted the full term. The prospect of a long term coalition would have made it difficult for both these parties to go to the average voter to vote for them and not for the other. And for this reason alone, I have always felt that it is not a question of IF, but WHEN.

    Secularism is important, but then existence is more important, right? 🙂

  4. BVN July 18, 2008 at 7:20 am

    Bhupinder, Thanks for the comment. Nobody seems to have a problem with the horse trading bit, the media would rather that the govt survive and the sensex stabilise 🙂

    BD, Thanks a lot 🙂 lets hope!

  5. BVN July 18, 2008 at 7:37 am

    I’m not that apprehensive. and this is why,

    1. They fought a bitter assembly election in 2006, with national leaders aligned on both sides – still the govt survived. this will not happen anywhere else.

    2. The electorate recognizes, atleast in Kerala, the Congress as a party of governance and the Left as a Corrective force. Thats the exact sentiment in a parliamentary election.

    Remember, the BJP tries to sell themselves in Kerala citing “see these two parties, support each other and all this is a gimmick” but people vote about the 60% mark and they vote for either front – not for BJP.

    My point is, a centrist experiment at centre is politically viable.

Leave A Comment